Council
denies failing to carry out a ‘credible consultation’ on waste.
by Beth McLoughlin
bethmcloughlin@trinitysouth.co.uk
The spectre of incineration has been raised again after campaigners slammed the public consultation process on waste issues.
They blasted Surrey County Council for its failure to
“undertake a credible consultation”' on its Waste Development Framework
These are plans for future treatment and final disposal of
waste, and include issues such as recycling landfill and waste reduction.
Capel Action Group (CAG) said it was a mistake to consult
online, because many people do not have web access.
But the county council pointed out that, as well as the
Internet there were also hard copies of the relevant papers in libraries and
the district council offices. A total of 2,000 were sent to individuals and
organisations.
A consultancy, Dialogue by Design, undertook the
consultation, which ended on February 28.
According to Surrey County Council, there were 244 online
responses and about 1,400 paper responses.
The CAG statement went on: "What is also clear is that
the internet is not a popular channel for completing complex, detailed
consultation returns.
"Surrey County Council ought to have been aware of this
and should have provided and effectively publicised a variety of means for
citizens to make their submissions."
But a county council spokesman said: "To have conducted
the consultation uniquely on paper, as CAG seems to propose would have been
both significantly more expensive and wasteful in terms of the amount of paper
the exercise would have generated."
She also hit back at claims the county council did not want
to reach the public in general and pointed at workshops on waste which were
held throughout last year to raise awareness.
The campaigners herald the public’s continued opposition to
incineration as reflected in the Surrey Local Government ' Association
consultation.
They point to support from Mole Valley District Council,
which has recently objected to the attempt by Surrey Waste Management to
mothball part of the Capel landfill site for future waste use, including
incineration.
They said: "Surrey County Council continues to preach incineration despite the clear impact that actions on minimisation, reuse and recycling are having."
They said in 2003-04 that national municipal waste levels
fell by one per cent, recycling and composting levels were up by 3.4 per cent
to 19 per cent and waste sent to landfill fell by 5.5 per cent.
The county council puts the figure closer to a 2.6 per cent
increase in the waste generated.
The spokesman said the county council is open to all ways of
dealing with waste that cannot be avoid ed, recycled, composed or reclaimed in
other ways.
CAG claims that the council is creating alarm by assessing
the increase so high and continuing to plan on this basis.
The campaigners conclude: "Surrey County Council is
failing in its duty to Surrey citizens to engage effectively with them in
developing its new Waste Development Framework
There is still time to get the process of consultation back
on track. Surrey County Council will be
pursuing a dangerous path if it fails to do so."